ifnlr1 ko iheps (TargetMol)
Structured Review

Ifnlr1 Ko Iheps, supplied by TargetMol, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ifnlr1 ko iheps/product/TargetMol
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Mechanisms of Differential Signal Transduction by IFNLR1 Variants"
Article Title: Mechanisms of Differential Signal Transduction by IFNLR1 Variants
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.1101/2025.10.03.677101
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Cartoon depicting IFNL bound to each IFNLR1 variant and complexed with IL10RB with proximal kinases JAK1 and TYK2 engaged. Note the truncation in the Box1 and Box2 JAK1 binding motifs within IFNLR1 variant 2. (B) Alignment of the JAK1 binding motifs for IFNLR1 variant 1 (Q8IU57; top sequence) and IFNLR1 variant 2 (Q8IU57-2; bottom sequence). Box 1 (blue highlight) and Box 2 (yellow highlight) domains are indicated and reveal the 29 amino acid truncation within the cytoplasmic domain of IFNLR1 variant 2 that eliminates the C-terminal residues of Box 1 and all but two residues of Box 2. Created in BioRender. Novotny, L. (2025) https://BioRender.com/24aqcgc .
Techniques Used: Variant Assay, Binding Assay, Sequencing
Figure Legend Snippet: Western blot analysis of whole cell lysates from ( A ) WT iHeps and ( B ) IFNLR1 -KO iHeps +/-dox-induced for 24h then treated +/-IFNL3 or IFNA2 for 15min. GAPDH served as an indicator of equivalent protein loading per lane. The ratio of phosphorylated to total protein for ( C ) dox-uninduced WT iHeps and ( D ) dox-induced IFNLR1 -KO iHeps +/-IFNL3 is shown as a percentage, based on integrated band intensity determined in ImageJ.
Techniques Used: Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Model depicting the mechanisms of distinct signaling outcomes imparted by ternary complexes composed of IFNL3, IL10RB and either IFNLR1 variant 1 or 2. Greater arrow width indicates higher association and/or phosphorylation (JAK1, STAT1, STAT2), greater internalization of receptor complexes, or higher induction of gene expression. IFNLR1 variant 1 containing heterodimers are depicted to have greater stability of JAK1 and/or pJAK1 binding and to be more prone to internalization than IFNLR1 variant 2 containing heterodimers. This correlates with variant 1 mediating more efficient phosphorylation of STAT1 and STAT2 and supporting higher expression of antiviral ISGs and de novo expression of proinflammatory ISGs compared to variant 2. ( B ) Model depicting assemblage of multimeric clusters containing multiple heterodimers of IFNL3-bound IFNLR1 variants in complex with IL10RB. In this model, proximity of JAK1 molecules bound to the cytoplasmic domains of IFNLR1 variants 1 and 2 could participate in TYK2-independent transphosphorylation. The relative abundance of IFNLR1 variants within multimeric complexes would influence the nature of receptor internalization, STAT phosphorylation, and downstream gene expression. The TYK2 dependence of signaling differs for antiviral vs. proinflammatory ISG expression and has a complex relationship with the relative abundance of IFNLR1 variants. Soluble variant 3, not studied in these experiments, is included in the model for consideration. Created in BioRender. Novotny, L. (2025) https://BioRender.com/24aqcgc .
Techniques Used: Variant Assay, Phospho-proteomics, Gene Expression, Binding Assay, Expressing